Sister Sites:
Supreme Court says courts must consider child’s age during police interrogations
Posted by: ftsnadmin
Tags:
Associated Press, Miranda warning, North Carolina Supreme Court, Supreme Court of the United States, U.S. Supreme Court, United States, Washington, Washington D.C.
Posted date:
June 16, 2011 |
No comment
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court says courts must consider age when examining whether a child is in custody and must be given Miranda rights.
The high court on Thursday ruled that police and school officials were wrong when they interviewed a 13-year-old special education student about a string of break-ins in Chapel Hill, N.C.
The interview took place in a closed room at his school. The boy was never read his Miranda rights, and his lawyer challenged the use of his confession.
The North Carolina Supreme Court refused to throw out the confession and said courts cannot look at age when examining whether the boy thought he could leave.
But the U.S. Supreme Court said in a 5-4 vote that courts have to consider how old the child was during the interrogation.
Related posts:
- New Mexico Supreme Court Lets Cops Grab Guns During Stops
- They Call This Justice: Supreme Court Legalizes Torture
- Facebook Used by Courts to Find Those Who Are ‘Only Online’
- Court: No right to resist illegal cop entry into home
- Police guidelines which allow forces to keep fingerprints and DNA of innocent people ARE unlawful, judges rule
Share This
About the author
ftsnadmin
