WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court says courts must consider age when examining whether a child is in custody and must be given Miranda rights.
The high court on Thursday ruled that police and school officials were wrong when they interviewed a 13-year-old special education student about a string of break-ins in Chapel Hill, N.C.
The interview took place in a closed room at his school. The boy was never read his Miranda rights, and his lawyer challenged the use of his confession.
The North Carolina Supreme Court refused to throw out the confession and said courts cannot look at age when examining whether the boy thought he could leave.
But the U.S. Supreme Court said in a 5-4 vote that courts have to consider how old the child was during the interrogation.
Related posts:
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of ecological, political and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.